There is a clear price difference of around Rs.7000 between the Nokia PureView 808 and the more expensive Samsung Galaxy S3, but is there a lot of differences in the features, hardware and software as well? Let us take a look at this in our latest smart phone battle -
Gautham On Google+
Nokia PureView 808 Vs Samsung Galaxy S3
Particulars | Samsung Galaxy S3 | Nokia PureView 808 |
Processor | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A9 | 1.3 GHz ARM 11 |
RAM | 1GB | 512 MB |
GPU | Mali-400MP | - |
Display Type | HD Super AMOLED | AMOLED capacitive touchscreen |
Display Size | 4.8-inches (306 ppi) | 360 x 640 pixels, 4.0 inches (~184 ppi pixel density) |
Internal Storage | 16/32/64 GB | 16 GB storage |
Expandable storage | Up to 64 GB via micro SD card | microSD, up to 32 GB |
Rear Camera | 8MP auto focus with LED flash | 41 MP (38 MP effective, 7152 x 5368 pixels), Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, Xenon flash |
Video calling camera | 1.9 MP, 720p Video | Yes, VGA; VGA@30fps video recording |
OS | Android 4.0.4 ICS | Nokia Belle OS |
Custom UI | TouchWiz UI v4.0 | - |
Battery | Li-Ion 2100 mAh | Standard battery, Li-Ion 1400 mAh (BV-4D) |
Dimensions | 136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 mm | 123.9 x 60.2 x 13.9 mm |
Weight | 133 g | 169 g |
As we can see above in the feature comparison between the Nokia PureView 808 and the Samsung Galaxy S3, the Nokia PureView 808 is far inferior to the Samsung Galaxy S3 in every way other than the 41MP which is way better than the 8MP camera of the S3.The shocking feature of the Nokia PureView 808 is the 184PPI.Nowadays smartphones costing 15000Rs come with better PPI than that, also the Nokia PureView 808 is one of the most heaviest phones out there at 169g, this is due to the large protruding camera a the back of the phone.
So which phone would you rather have? The Nokia PureView 808? or The Samsung Galaxy S3?